Sitter/participant relationship quality

Love

Love is defined as the spirituality of sensation. It behooves you to regard the orgy of self-denial in ascetisicm as an equivalent impulse to the false gratification in the most extreme hedonism, enacted sadistically as a group and masochistically as an individual.[1][2][3]

Parasocial love

There is a contrast between noble morality and a morality born out of resentment/impotence clouding your mind in some feeble attempt of revenge for what you mistakenly believe reality owes you. Touch grass if you think you are magically invulnerable from your fans after inciting a physically violent fanbase.

Ethical systems are a spook

It's probably better to discuss 'oughts' in a meta-ethical framework as opposed to virtue ethics, deontology, or utilitarianism due to it having no natural science basis.

Value systems

Here's some unprovable values that might be fun to expand upon or structure papers around sometime:

  • Emphasize: self-mastery through strength/self-sacrifice[4] with a heap of global interwoven mythological structures while maintaining a playful anti-institutional leaning.
  • Dissuade: the idea person A is a better authority on person B than person B is upon themself, the simultaneous contradictory framework of institutionalized guilt and abdication of personal responsibility[5][6], both hermeneutic inflexibility and relativism, zero-sum toxic positivity games.

It is an interpersonal exploitation to command a state of empathy and then project upon others the correction for internal disliked feelings (tone-policing, the unchondrotined egoism of using others as a scapegoat avatar for your personal unshared dysfunction).

Real world examples exist where people have been imprisoned not for saying harmful things, but instead, imprisoned on the notion that they were perhaps planning to say harmful things.[7] All major western religions encode rape, genocide, and murder within their lessons. Remove the champions of this mariana-trench-level-critical-thinking-skills censorship zealots from your life.

Hippocratic Oath restated in terms of value systems

Avoid doing and believing others' self-righteous indignation (aka 'I'm harming you for your own good'); it's a self-justification for promoting harm towards others derived from nonprovable value systems. View these moral grandstanders with extreme suspicion as they typically produce the worst outcomes for others via the delusion that they do not act in self-interest.[8][9][10][11][12][13] Harming others with no falsifiable benefit is created from a structurally internalized mediocrity fueling an ego-inflating/ego-protecting existential ressentiment.[14]

References

  1. ↑ Nietzsche, F. W. Morality as Anti-Nature. Twilight of the Idols. 
  2. ↑ Deleuze, G., Deleuze, G., Sacher-Masoch, L. (2006). On Coldness and Cruelty (Venus in Furs ed.). Zone Books. ISBN 9780942299557. 
  3. ↑ Alan Watts (direct-ish quote: "You ought to thank your parents for their taboo as an exercise in excitation")
  4. ↑ Nietzsche, F. W. §12 On the Genealogy of Morals. 
  5. ↑ Nietzsche, F. W. §26 The Antichrist. 
  6. ↑ Watts, A., What Game Would You Like To Play? 
  7. ↑ Hitchens, C. (2006), Christopher Hitchens - Free Speech 
  8. ↑ Friedman, M., Milton Friedman Speaks: Is Capitalism Humane? 
  9. ↑ Watts, A., 24:43-28:00 Man in Nature, The Tao of Philosophy 
  10. ↑ Joseph Campbell
  11. ↑ Peterson, J., Lecture content (a potent example is on Alexander Solzhenitsyn) 
  12. ↑ Bill Hicks
  13. ↑ Burr, B., Drop Dead Years, The standup special discography arc reaching to Drop Dead Years is probably therapeutic; it’s young-fiery-guy learning acceptance (big part of CBT/DBT) 
  14. ↑ Friedrich Nietzsche
Retrieved from ‘https://psychonautwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Sitter/participant_relationship_quality&oldid=170083’